The element itself wasn’t too radical. In classes past, we’ve had problems with students not staying on track with their projects, so the professor wanted to introduce weekly status reports, where each student would send a 25-word blurb updating him on where they were with each project. After a stretch where students were just incrementally updating their projects without having “real” updates to give, they didn’t much see the point in keeping up with the reports. The professor was also not a big fan of having to collect and read through 15-20 reports every single week, even if they were short. Another, larger, issue was that in past years, there was always a mix of experienced and novice students in the class (and small class sizes–5-6), so the more experienced students could help teach the novices basic techniques and equipment use. Starting last year, we had classes of 10 students, all of whom were completely new. Suffice to say we were unprepared for how difficult it would be to supervise and instruct 10 students in a lab class, when each student simultaneously needed individual attention. The old teaching style of “just go out there and start making things” didn’t work so well, because none of the students knew what they were doing or had any sort of background in the subject. This year, I’ve made efforts to give more formal instruction in the class before we go to the lab portion, but for my professor, old habits die hard. It also doesn’t help that the foundry is generally open for most of the day, so students will come in to work on projects an hour or two before class starts, so we would have to go and round them all up and bring them in the classroom to formally teach them something.
It’s still a work in progress and I’m working on ways to streamline and improve the flow of the class.