Adbhut, thank you so much for writing about this issue! As Deb mentioned, it’s so great that more and more men are allies, and it’s clear from this topic choice that you are one. However, I wanted to take this comment to mention how scientists (especially those in social science and neuroscience) need to be better allies as well. Frequently, an interesting and publishable finding is a sex difference. However, there is rarely any impetus from the journals for you to explain why the sex difference exists. This bothers me, because usually there is a cause that is not simply or merely biological. For my undergraduate Honors thesis, I wanted to examine a classic sex difference in psychology to uncover its mechanism. Specifically, the finding that boys/men outperform women in mental rotation. In my sample, this finding held, but I also uncovered that what is more predictive of mental rotation is personality factors. Certain personality factors are encouraged more in boys than girls, so this difference could be the result of socialization. So often this difference has been touted as biological (people have even researched whether male infants outperform female infants at mental rotation to “prove” this point!), but it, along with many sex differences are not–they are the effects of a patriarchal society. I think there needs to be more recognition of that, so the onus is on social scientists and neuroscientists to reconsider whether a sex difference alone is truly an interesting finding in and of itself. When we stop saying “yes” and instead focus on the mechanisms, then we can better educate society on how to alleviate these differences.