Comment on “Professional” by Sarah Plummer

Some of the teachers I admired most in undergrad had a very strong articulated viewpoint in art, politics, society, yadda yadda. Even those I disagreed with challenged me to think in new ways. I’ve always thought about how much I appreciated them and wondered where I fall on the spectrum of apolitical vs. supercharged, rabble-rouser. This semester I’ve been a little more reserved than I have been in the past for a lot of reasons. A guarded sense of professionalism. A new program. Different kinds of students here. Focusing more on my own work. I need to figure out how to encourage students to explore valid emotional intelligence. I thought the Palmer reading was really interesting.

Comment on What is school for? by Sarah Plummer

I really appreciate your comment, and I agree that to have the kind of idealistic educational format he suggests would need A LOT of different interventions to become a reality, including the issues of school ranking and name recognition. Also, some of his suggestions come from a real place of privilege. For instance, Homework by day, lectures by night takes for granted that students life in an environment where they can access devices to watch the lectures and have an environment that allows for them to listen easily (quiet, stress-free, physically and emotionally safe, etc.).

Posted in Uncategorized

Comment on Humanities and Real-World Needs! by Sarah Plummer

I really appreciated your taking Edelstein’s argument further, and I agree that people in the humanities might be more likely to learn about local culture. I also think a humanities background helps people think of different or new solutions. (In other words not just recreating what has worked in other places, like tapped water.) I like your framing humanities as a real world, practical concept. I’m trying to do that more myself.

Comment on Critical Pedagogy by Sarah Plummer

It is really nice to see you think about critical pedagogy in different fields. Sometimes I think those of us who teach in the humanities have it easy, or struggle in how to incorporate technology. It is harder in many of the sciences to think about how to incorporate these ideas. But, I’m really interested in thinking about how other disciplines do this…in part because I’m in an interdisciplinary program and I’m going to have to think about this issue later on. Awesome job!

Like

Comment on Paulo Freire & Bell Hooks….educators I can stand by…..and an ode to Linda Brown….. by Sarah Plummer

Hey Lehi,
I also thought about the student protests when I read Freire. Oftentimes there’s an assumption that education should not be political or teachers should not share their views. This is hard. Many of the professors I adored were very transparent in their personal politics. I feel like Freire gives us permission to talk about politics in ways that empower our students. How exciting.

Comment on If the stormtroopers weren’t all white by Sarah Plummer

Yeah, those bias tests are challenging. But here’s the thing. We learn all kinds of biases from birth on (from our parents, society in general, the freaking toy store), but just because we grew up learning that Barbie goes with Ken doesn’t mean we act on that. Implicit biases may be there, but we don’t act in split seconds every day, especially when something matters. There is always time for us to assess our viewpoint and make inclusive decisions. But, yeah. I feel your pain.