“What starts as a blog, ends as an academic output, and an output with a ready-made audience, eager to cite it” (Hitchcock 2014)
While I find great worth in academic publication, I also find it inaccessible; lacking in social impact and problematic in terms of who the work is being written for. In the social sciences, especially, much of our work is done for purposes of impact, informing emerging public policy or redirecting the course of social relationships. While there is a level of assumed integrity associated with publishing in academic journals, I must wonder if the work of the discipline is better served in a space that is open to public dialogue and discussion. If the output of social science work stays within the “academy,” especially given the tools to reach larger audiences, it would seem selfish to argue only amongst intellectual colleagues in regards to the use or misuse of some theoretical application or interpretation of a text. Instead, it seems the work of social science disciplines would be better served if the discussion was just that – a discussion – a reciprocal dialogue between academics and the larger society. This works to both inform academic research and offer a space in which social facts can be given qualitative context.
Like Hitchcock, I find twitter and blogging excellent mediums for this type of work. However, unless one is utilizing two separate handles, twitter runs the risk of conflating the individual and the academic. I do to an extent agree with Hitchcock (2014) that anything placed on Twitter should be treated with the same seriousness as an academic review or questions following a public lecture. But, does this not defeat the value of Twitter? Can it not be treated as a space, even for the academic, to evolve intellectually and allow their own moral compass to inform their opinions and reflections of public policy while also disseminating information? Isn’t this the value that blogging and Twitter create that academic journals – especially those highlighting empirical evidence – turn a cold shoulder to? This is difficult as Twitter can become a snapshot of both one’s character and one’s academic work. While academia oftentimes encourages one to take themselves out of the work, spaces such as Facebook and Twitter would encourage one to be apart of the work (i.e. be actively engaged in the conversation). This is especially given that grassroots social movements and policy implications are happening on social media. Instant reporting is happening on social media. Thus, the work of social science fields are being played out in real time.
One of the larger challenges is finding ways in which to get students excited and involved in the discipline via social media. That though you are an academic, you are also an individual with thoughts and informed opinions that might be deemed inappropriate for the classroom but expected and even celebrated on forms such as Twitter and Facebook. How do educators manage the student/professor relationship in a professional manner while making efforts to meet the students “where they are at?”
Hitchcock, T. (2014) http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2014/07/28/twitter-and-blogs-academic-public-sphere/