Inquiry is at the core of students’ essence

Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed is a constant exchange of arguments between reactionary and revolutionary positions. While I have long flirted with the reactionary nineteenth century society, I am most stimulated by some of Freire’s assertions regarding a revolution in education – and ultimately, in society. His statement “Education is suffering from narration sickness” summarizes […]

Read more

how to make changes constructively?— A reflection of critical pedagogy and the issue of Dr. Coward in Berkeley.  

  First thing first, I totally agree with the reading this week about critical pedagogy. We all, sometimes, went through the terrible banking learning mechanism. The classroom is boring. The lecturer is the best hypnotist. The final exam is really a painful but relieving time. The painful part comes from the fact that I have … Continue reading how to make changes constructively?— A reflection of critical pedagogy and the issue of Dr. Coward in Berkeley.  

Read more

Teaching: A challenging yet exciting way of life

The topic of this week’s class is one of the most interesting topics we touched on throughout the semester. The readings about critical pedagogy, particularly the thoughts and ideas of Paulo Freire, are enlightening and thought provoking. They led me to realize that I signed up for a difficult yet exciting task as a future teacher. I am part of the generation that is tasked to change and challenge the “banking model” of education where we fill the minds of passive students by “knowledge” and test them on how well they memorized the material. I am part of the generation that is responsible to equip the young minds by the needed tools to become active, curious, tolerant, and creative individuals where students are able to “create possibilities” and “construct knowledge”. Our role, as teachers, is to teach eager minds how to  think critically and create new solutions to new problems rather than repeating what has already been done.

This responsibility is challenging and can be overwhelming at times. However, when teachers embrace the curiosity and love of knowledge as a way of life, teaching comes naturally and becomes an easy task. As teachers of the new era, we have to have certain qualities and need to reflect those qualities to our students through our personality, teaching style, delivery method, flexibility, and expectations. We have to be tolerant so we learn different things from different people like Paulo Freire noted. We have to be directive and dialogic, but not manipulative, static, and authoritarian as noted in Dr. Fowler’s presentation. We have to think critically, challenge ourselves, keep on learning, learn from their experiences, adapt to change, be curious, and become thinkers themselves. Above all, we should reflect those qualities to our students, rethink our teaching methods to suit the needs of the 21st century, be energetic, be prepared, and be passionate about our mission.

Read more

Critical Pedagogy in Engineering Classroom

Critical pedagogy is the education movement aimed developing students into socially and politically aware individuals, helping them recognize authoritarian tendencies, empowering them to act against injustice, and employing democratic and inclusive classroom practices. The term “critical pedagogy” has been used by educators to refer to a broad range of pedagogies that employ critical theory, feminist theory, queer theory, anti-racist theory, multicultural education, and inclusive pedagogies. In this post, I will discuss some of the critical pedagogy practices employed by Dr. Donna Riley (currently a professor at Virginia Tech) while teaching a class called “Engineering Thermodynamics” as Smit College, an all women college, during Spring and Fall semesters of 2002. It should be noted that Riley uses liberative pedagogy as an inclusive term for critical pedagogy, feminist pedagogy, and radical pedagogy. Some of the classroom practices employed by Riley included:


Connecting learning to students’ experiences. Students learn the most from examples which they can relate to, based on their social and cultural backgrounds. Hence, Riley used a wide variety of thermodynamic systems in class as examples. Also, the textbook for the class was chosen such that it contained a wide variety of examples of thermodynamic systems.


Democratic classroom practices. Students were assigned teaching roles to teach parts of the course to the entire class. They were not only asked to develop modules to teach the class but also encouraged to relate them to their own lives. Also, the seating arrangement reflected the democratic classroom practices. Instead of sitting in rows facing the instructor, students were asked to sit in circles with each student facing and talking to the entire class instead of just the instructor.

Taking responsibility for one’s own learning. Students were required to take responsibility for their learning in that they were asked to do metacognitive reflections on what was working or not working for them in the class. They were also asked to do assignments in which they reflected on their learning of various aspects of the course.


Ethics discussions.In order for students to be develop as ethically responsible individuals, they need to learn the impact which an engineer’s work has on the society. To develop such an ethical awareness, Riley and her class watched and critiqued videos on “energy in society”, critiqued the textbook used for the class by analyzing the aspects (e.g. alternate energy, environmental applications of thermodynamics, energy system in developing countries) which were missing from the textbook. Also, students were assigned ethics problems to reflect on.


Breaking the Western hegemony. In order to decenter the male hegemony of the Western civilization, Riley discussed examples of thermodynamic inventions done by non-Western and non-male inventors. Also, some of the assignments required students to make interracial and intercultural connections in thermodynamics.


Normalizing mistakes.By normalizing mistakes in the process of learning, Riley fostered a classroom environment in which students were comfortable attempting problems (sometimes even on the black board) in class and learning from their mistakes. Another strategy used by her for normalizing mistakes was acknowledging when she herself did not know something.


Discussion of history and philosophy. Riley discussed the history and philosophy of the development of thermodynamic laws to demonstrate to the students that the process of discovery does not lead one to an absolute truth. Instead, making mistakes is acceptable in the process of discovery. Students were also required to reflect on how the knowledge of history and philosophy of thermodynamics helped their learning.


Assessment techniques. The assessment of students put a greater emphasis on participation. Moreover, a flexible grading system was adopted. Students were asked to work in pairs on some exams. In the second offering of the course, problems were given to the students only as a learning exercise and not as an assessment tool. Moreover, continual course feedback was taken from students to improve their learning experience.


One of the critiques of critical pedagogy is that it does not provide specific classroom practices. It just suggests that teaching and learning should be contextual and aim at raising critical awareness among students. A lot of times educators do not know how to apply critical pedagogy in their classes, especially in hard and applied sciences, due to a lack of knowledge about how to apply it. I hope the practices noted above can be adopted to and adapted for any classroom and any discipline.


P.S. The complete paper in which Riley discusses her experiences of applying liberative pedagogy in her classes can be found from: Riley, D. (2003). Employing liberative pedagogies in engineering education. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 9(2), 137–158.

Read more
1 2 3 4 5 9