Turner, thanks for the great post. I have also wrote my post around the same ideas. We, as future educators, are tasked to be the change we want to see. As you noted in your quotes, we face different issues than the old days and we must think anew and have what it takes to challenge the way we have passively learned.
Turner, thanks for the great post. I have also wrote my post around the same ideas. We, as future educators, are tasked to be the change we want to see. As you noted in your quotes, we face different issues than the old days and we must think anew and have what it takes to challenge the way we have passively learned.
Ayesha, very interesting and important points you list at the end of your post. I can connect a lot with the need to redefine our concepts of education where the students are more engaged and are the center of learning not only passive receptors.
Very interesting idea. We need to find the breakthrough idea based on the existing knowledge. The bank mode is still useful, and at the meantime, critical thinking for the existing knowledge can help students more creative. Student should be subject for the education but not the object, although we could be the object of some teaching experiment.
I like how you reflected on your own experiences. You bring a very interesting point about how educators should start embracing these concepts before graduate schools and even in high schools. By the time we finish high school, we are so used to being passive that it becomes hard to break out of our shell and be creative!
So where does this critical thought ability develop? At some point basic concepts must be learned in order to understand larger concepts that require more critical thinking. Banking certainly is not the answer, but as we have seen so far, we are hardly ready to completely rearrange the way we learn and teach. The answers might come in at the higher education level where many classes can be developed and carried out in their own nuanced ways. The problem then will be communicating the value of the new system to the product of the old system who rates and judges those wha are brave enough to try this.
So where does this critical thought ability develop? At some point basic concepts must be learned in order to understand larger concepts that require more critical thinking. Banking certainly is not the answer, but as we have seen so far, we are hardly ready to completely rearrange the way we learn and teach. The answers might come in at the higher education level where many classes can be developed and carried out in their own nuanced ways. The problem then will be communicating the value of the new system to the product of the old system who rates and judges those wha are brave enough to try this.
I really liked the point that you made about our goal as educators is to empower and establish student's ownership in their learning. As a GTA, I think this is something that I strive for on a daily basis because I know the value that students have in taking my class. While they might not recognize it during our time together throughout the semester, I have found that students will often come back and mention how helpful the course has been outside of the classroom (I teach the dreaded public speaking). My methodology behind teaching was similar to what you mentioned about 'knowing the consumer by becoming the consumer' in that I approach teaching as I would like to be taught myself. I think its important to realize as educators, that we were once in the shoes of our students and think back to those that influenced us the most and try to embody those qualities/characteristics as we move forward in our teaching careers.
Great post! I love your idea that “classroom should be an exchange of information, creativity and critical thinking”. I had a “banking model” experience in one of my college classes. The teacher was just reading his slides for us in class. I can understand he was a new instructor and nervous in front of his students. However, it was not a correct start of the teaching career. New teacher can learn from the success model of those popular teachers and try to change their “banking model”. Teachers should also learn from their students: exchange ideas, emphasize their feedback, and learn from their critical thinking.
Exactly, we call this the “so what?” that we have to deliver when we talk about our own research. I definitely remember quite a few classes that did not provide any real reasoning for their purpose. I feel like I am at an advantage for working in an applied field where so much of what we teach and research has a very specific set of reasons.