Comment on Valuing Knowledge: A VT GrATE Teach-in by Lindsay

I’m glad that you came and found the discussion entertaining! The Null curriculum is really hard to address when we don’t know it’s there, but having folks even be cognoscenti of it’s impact can instantiate little changes that eventually build up! Or they take it back to the dinner table and tell their family/friends everything they were taught about sex and gender was a lie…

Like

Posted in Uncategorized

Comment on Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy by Dalya Ismael

My opinion about open access is similar to yours. I believe that our role as researchers and educators is to benefit the public. The public needs US to solve their wide range of problems from health, to transportation and sustainable development. We need to hear the public, and conduct research according to their needs, and provide them with our results. Unfortunately, what is happening now is the opposite, faculty conduct research for their own benefit, and not for the publics benefit, and whether it addresses the publics’ need or not, is not the main concern. Thanks for sharing!

Posted in Uncategorized

Comment on MOOCs: Some Attendance Required by Allan

I think you make a fair point on the content, but I think the idea that so many people are exposed to material in these courses is still pretty amazing. Even a 2% completion rate for 226,000 students still means 5,200 people getting exposed to new ideas in that 12-week span. Given the right context (eg courses that don’t claim to be all-encompassing, but serve as a gateway to further knowledge) I think it makes for an excellent starting point that might get people excited about pursuing further knowledge. I agree though, that these shouldn’t be used to supplant traditional courses, but they might make excellent stepping stones to even online-only smaller courses for the people who come out and truly want to learn more.

Posted in Uncategorized