As we race toward the end of the semester, please take some time to reflect on the readings for our final unit (week 14). The articles by Parker Palmer and Dan Edelstein are especially relevant, and if you are only going to read two more things for this class, please, please, please let these be the pieces you choose. Think about how you will connect the dots from this course and your broader curriculum to become the “New Professional” Parker Palmer invokes here:
The word “professional” originally meant someone who makes a “profession of faith” in the midst of a disheartening world. That root meaning became diminished as the centuries rolled by, and today it has all but disappeared. “Professional” now means someone who possesses knowledge and techniques too esoteric for the laity to understand, whose education is proudly proclaimed to be “value free.”
The notion of a “new professional” revives the root meaning of the word. This person can say, “In the midst of the powerful force-field of institutional life, where so much conspires to compromise the core values of my work, I have found firm ground on which to stand—the ground of personal and professional identity and integrity—and from which I can call myself, my colleagues, and my profession back to our true mission.”
Thank you all for sharing this semester with me and for your collective efforts to explore what teaching means in the changing landscape of the 21st-century higher education. I look forward to reading your final set of posts.
Image: CC0 Public Domain
This week we will divide our energies between two topics. You may post about either one. If you aren’t posting this week, please listen to the podcast and do as much of the reading as you can.
The first topic, “Open Critical Pedagogy,” gives you the opportunity to explore the ways critical pedagogy ( the concepts we worked with a couple weeks ago) informs various currents related to “Open Education” and “Open Access” in contemporary higher ed. If you’ve been wondering how you might operationalize Freire’s commitment to accessible, mind liberating education and hooks’ attention to amplifying marginalized voices in your own teaching, you will find ample inspiration in Rajiv Jhangiani’s podcast. (Be sure to check out some of the affiliated sources on the podcast home page.)
The second is the issue paying attention and focusing on a particular task, challenge or experience. Alternate titles for this topic could be:”The Keys to Happiness,” “Balance and Flow” and “Making the Genie Work for You.” There are several reading selections for you to consider. You don’t have to read them all, but should make sure to look at Clive Thompson’s chapter. For the other selections, try to pick readings with opposing or contrasting viewpoints.
This is a LONG prompt with lots of information…please read carefully and refer back to this before the next class:
This week we will examine contemporary diversity issues and think about how to use inclusive pedagogy in our classrooms. Just as our learning environments are complex, so are the individuals that comprise them. Everyone has visible as well as “invisible” cultural identities, and inclusive pedagogy attends to those differences. Inclusive pedagogy seeks to engage learners in ways that are inclusive and supports environments that are attentive to diversity. It also helps prepare students to contribute productively to an increasingly complex and globalized society by helping them develop a broader understanding of domestic and global diversity issues.
So, this is a big project. And an important one. Some of us have already thought about and worked extensively in this area, some of us are just dipping our toes in, and many of us are somewhere in between. This is ok. In fact, it’s even a plus.
To prepare for seminar, please read the required texts.(id’d with an asterisk*) Start with the two short selections (on the Hidden Brain and diversity in the workplace). Then please read the pages on inclusive pedagogy and difficult conversations at Georgetown’s Center for New Design in Learning and Scholarship.
You’ll note that some of the materials for this module have been updated or inspired by the recent upturn in incidents of racism and intolerance locally and nationally. Make sure to listen to the podcast on “Dismantling Racism in Education.” I also encourage you to listen to the On Being podcast with Mahzarin Benajii, particularly if you want to know more about hidden / implicit biases. (Benajii is one of the developers of the Implicit Association Test — see below….)
The selections by Claude Steele and the article on Brave Spaces / Safe Spaces are longer, but you should read them as well and come to class ready to talk about them. As usual, you may blog about whatever resonates most with you.
If you want more of a deep dive or are already familiar with these texts, please explore the supplemental materials on Canvas and on the supplemental page on the schedule. If there are items you think we should know about, please tweet them out to #gedivt
- Consider taking an implicit association test before our meeting next week.
- Please nominate posts you want to discuss in class or see featured in Hot Topics before Midnight Tuesday October 9. There is a sheet in the class Drive folder for this.
- Consider completing an activity for the “Equity” module in the Equity Unbound cMOOC
Image licensed under Creative Commons 2.0
This week you have a great opportunity to explore your teaching style and approach. What kind of a teacher are you? How would you like to teach? Please consult the readings for next week — they range considerably in tone and intent, and then tell us about your “authentic teaching self.”
I was so excited to stumble upon Equity Unbound, a cMOOC facilitated by Maha Bali, Catherine Cronin, and Mia Zamora this weekend. Inclusion, diversity, paradigm busting, and openness are at the heart of Contemporary Pedagogy (aka “GEDI”), a professional development course for future faculty I teach every semester. When I saw that Equity Unbound would …
Continue reading "The Overstory – A cMOOC Un-Introduction"
Our topic for this week is “Assessment.”
I plan to have us watch one of the Dan Pink videos posted on the Schedule this evening, but if stuff happens and we don’t get there, you will definitely want to familiarize yourself with Pink’s perspective before proceeding further. (Choose between the 11 minute animated version and the 18′ 30″ TED Talk). Then read “The Case Against Grades” (Alfie Kohn) and “Imagination First” (Liu and Noppe-Brandon). If you get to Lombardi’s piece on “The Role of Assessment in Authentic Learning,” and /or Peter Elbow’s “Ranking, Evaluating and Liking,” that would be great.
You may post about whatever issue (or set of issues) raised in these materials resonates with you the most. Assessment is a complicated topic and we have complicated (and sometimes contradictory) ideas about how it works and how it should work (in general and in our particular field.) This should be an interesting session, and I am eager to read what you have to say.
For those interested in annotating via Hypothes.is, there’s a good public thread available for the Kohn reading and I’ve started one for Lombardi’s text here (for the GEDIVT) group.
Image: By State Library of Queensland, Australia [No restrictions], via Wikimedia Commons
Once again, everything is on the table as long as it engages the readings for next week and /or the topic of mindfulness in teaching and learning. You might want to respond to the readings in the context of the videos and discussion we shared this evening. You might want to reflect on your current understanding of pedagogy — connected or otherwise — knowing that this might change. And you might want to go back to Gardner Campbell’s article on networked learning as experiential learning to see if there are some new connections you might want to make in light of our F2F session and the discussion of gamification today.
Whichever path you take we look forward to reading your work and talking with you about it. We will be working with Langer’s concept of “Mindful Learning” during class next week, so please make sure you’ve read those texts and can access them during our class session.
Now that we’ve thought about networked learning as experiential learning it’s time to think about how we learn and how the web has facilitated a shift in the way we think about different kinds of learning and learning experiences. The readings for next week develop some of the ideas we addressed in class about participatory cultures, gaming, and arc of life learning. Different people (teachers and students) respond to learning environments in their own unique way and there is no “one size fits all” approach to engaging today’s student. But most people agree that imagination is an essential component of motivation, and next week is all about firing up the imagination for digital learners. For your posts, please read the materials and write about whatever issue (or set of issues) resonates with you the most.
Depending on how our time goes today, we may introduce Hypothes.is, a powerful web annotation tool that can support you research and teaching. If we don’t get to it this week, we’ll take it up next time. If you’re feeling adventurous, please check out Hypothes.is (watch the video, install the plugin in your browser) and feel free to start annotating.
This should be an interesting session, and I am eager to read what you have to say.
Dear GEDI’s! I write in great anticipation of meeting you all in person on Wednesday. I am eager to get to know you and to begin a journey of self-discovery, reflection, and collaborative inquiry that will take us not just through the end of the semester, but, if we do it right, far far beyond (perhaps to a galaxy far, far away….).
Once we’ve made introductions and worked through the logistical details, we will talk a bit about connected learning and how we will use the network in this course. After all of that, I hope the following will give you some guidance and inspiration as you set up your blog and formulate your first post:
Blogging guidelines for week one:
Everything is on the table as long as it engages the readings for next week and /or the topic of networked learning. You might want to respond to the readings in the context of the discussion we shared this evening.
You might want to reflect on your current understanding of pedagogy — connected or otherwise — knowing that this might change. Whatever approach you take, know that it will be fine, and that your colleagues will be attentive, interested readers.
Bonus Force Points:
Check out and play with Hypothes.is, an amazingly powerful web annotating tool.
Double Bonus Points:
Read and maybe even add to the Hypothes.is conversation about Gardner Campbell’s article on Networked Learning as Experiential Learning. (If you’re looking for me, my screen name in Hypothes.is is “Laika57”.)